Introduction
The scoring pipeline produces candidates with composite tiers and opportunity types. This guide walks through how to use those outputs to construct a portfolio — from selecting qualifying candidates to calculating your cash position.
Step 1: Start with Qualifying Candidates
Only EXCEPTIONAL and HIGH composite tier stocks get allocations:
- EXCEPTIONAL and HIGH — eligible for position sizing
- WATCHLIST — monitor only, never allocate
- NONE — skip entirely
If no stocks qualify at EXCEPTIONAL or HIGH, hold cash. An empty portfolio is a valid position.
Step 2: Check the Sizing Matrix
Position sizing is determined by composite tier multiplied by opportunity type:
| | EXCEPTIONAL | HIGH | WATCHLIST |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compounder | 15% | 8% | 0% |
| Mispricing | 12% | 6% | 0% |
| Both | 20% | 10% | 0% |
"Both" gets the largest allocation because two independent scoring signals (value + quality) provide stronger evidence. A stock qualifying on both Track A (Compounder) and Track B (Mispricing) combines durable competitive advantages with temporary market undervaluation — a rare and powerful combination.
Step 3: Apply Diversification Constraints
- Maximum 10 positions per portfolio
- Watch for sector concentration — avoid loading up on one industry
- The 10-position limit is a hard cap, even if more stocks qualify
Even if multiple candidates in the same sector pass all scoring gates, consider your total sector exposure. The engine scores each stock independently — it does not automatically balance across sectors.
Step 4: Calculate Your Cash Position
- Cash = 100% minus the sum of all position sizes
- Cash is a deliberate position, not a failure to be fully invested
- In conservative market environments, the system may produce fewer qualifying candidates, resulting in a larger cash position
Not being fully invested is a valid output. If the engine only finds 3-4 qualifying candidates, it is telling you the opportunity set is limited. Forcing capital into marginal ideas to achieve full investment is one of the most common portfolio construction mistakes.
Building a 5-Stock Portfolio
Starting candidates from the dashboard:
- AAPL — HIGH / Compounder = 8%
- GOOG — EXCEPTIONAL / Both = 20%
- JPM — HIGH / Mispricing = 6%
- MSFT — HIGH / Compounder = 8%
- UNH — HIGH / Compounder = 8%
Total allocated: 50%
Cash position: 50%
This is normal — a 50% cash position reflects conservative composite tier sizing. The engine is expressing that half the hypothetical portfolio should be deployed across these 5 candidates, with the remaining capital held in reserve.
Step 5: Review and Rebalance
- Check weekly for composite tier changes
- If a stock drops from HIGH to WATCHLIST, reduce to 0%
- If a stock is eliminated, exit the position
- Don't rebalance on minor score fluctuations — wait for composite tier changes
A change in composite tier (e.g., HIGH to EXCEPTIONAL) is meaningful. A small change in composite score within the same composite tier is usually noise. See the Weekly Review Process guide for a structured approach.
Position sizing transparency
Check any EXCEPTIONAL stock on the dashboard. The suggested position size will be larger than a HIGH stock of the same opportunity type. WATCHLIST stocks always show 0% allocation.
Common Pitfalls
- Don't allocate to WATCHLIST stocks — the system explicitly recommends 0%. If a stock hasn't cleared enough scoring gates, the engine is saying it does not warrant capital allocation yet.
- Don't fill a 10-position portfolio for the sake of being "fully invested" — quality matters more than quantity. A 4-position portfolio with high-scoring beats a 10-position portfolio with diluted evidence.
- Don't ignore sector concentration — diversification matters even among high-scoring picks. Three strong candidates from the same sector significantly increase your exposure to sector-specific events.
- Don't fight the cash position — if the system produces few qualifying candidates, that's information. The engine is telling you the opportunity set is limited.